SIR - David Rhodes is right in his comments regarding Iraq (T&A Letters, September 20).
Though I opposed the invasion of Iraq, I must now admit that the situation in Iraq is worsened not so much by the presence of coalition forces, but by the actions of the insurgents.
Scarcely a day passes without images of blood-curdling barbarity being beamed into our living rooms from that country.
Is it not these very atrocities and their frequency that necessitates the occupation by the coalition, and without whom, the most likely outcome would be a civil war.
Such being the grim prospect, and unless coalition troops were replaced by a UN or a multi-national force comprising of forces from Muslim countries, the withdrawal of coalition troops would be a wholly irresponsible act on the part of any government.
I would also concur with David Rhodes that a majority of Iraqis would welcome the chance to live in a democratic society which affords them basic human rights such as freedom of speech, rather than live in one which incarcerates, or worse, tortures and executes for daring to disagree with their rulers.
Dilip M Dhokia, Oulton Terrace, Bradford
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article