SIR – The nation is now planning to spend £30 billion (which we don’t have) on a super-speed train line to shave a few minutes, from a few journeys, for a few users?
What financial nonsense. Where’s the cost-benefit case in that?
In most door-to-door journey times, the train element represents only a minor proportion of the total elapsed time, so the real amount saved on the whole journey would be utterly trivial.
At what cost? There is not only the borrowed money, but also the disturbance, disruption and environmental distress from the resultant despoiling of the precious countryside through which it passes.
This plan cannot be justified on any practical level.
One must assume that it only arises from a puerile desire of some politicians to have a even bigger ‘train set’ to play with, now that they can no longer claim for a personal Hornby-Dublo on expenses.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article