The following have been dealt with by Bradford magistrates:

Sajid Manir, 30, of Staveley Road, Keighley; theft, failure to surrender to custody, six months conditional discharge, £129 compensation, £85 costs; failure to comply with community order, order varied. Matthew Peter Robinson, 22, of Ewart Street, Great Horton; possession of cannabis/cannabis resin, £50 fine, £15 costs.; possession of ketamine, failure to surrender to custody, no separate penalty. Paul Steel, 28, of Deneside Mount, Bankfoot; theft, £349 compensation, £85 costs.

Stephen Richard Ambler, 55, of Deanery Gardens, Bank Top; application to be bound over, bound over for 12 months, threatening words and behaviour, £100 fine, £100 costs. Peter John Lowther, 49, of Farway, Holme Wood; harassment, using threatening words or behaviour, £100 fine, £100 costs. Ashley Paul Williams, 21, of Hatfield Road, Undercliffe; application to be bound over, bound over for 12 months.

Thomas William Farndale, 24, of Torre Road, Horton Bank Top; theft, community order with 100 hours unpaid work. Wakar Ahmed, 18, of Westfield Road, Heaton; driving without insurance, £610 fine, £100 costs, licence endorsed, driving without a licence, no separate penalty. Usman Choudhry, 22, of Pickles Lane, Great Horton; driving without insurance, £525 fine, £100 costs.

Stephen Daniel, 48, of Whetley Grove, Girlington; speeding, £175 fine, £100 costs, licence endorsed. Tanwir Hussain Ghazi, 35, of Heath Road, Undercliffe; driving without insurance, £610 fine, £100 costs, licence endorsed; driving without a licence, two counts of driving without MOT, failure to produce documents, no separate penalty. Enus Miah, 41, of Springfield Place, Manningham; four counts of failure to comply with regulations re management of housing in multiple occupation, £2,500 fine, £1,725 costs.

  • We wish to point out that all the information in this court file is provided by the magistrates’ court, which collates the details largely from prosecutors and the police. In calculating the amount of any fine, the court takes into account the income of the offender as well as the seriousness of the offence.