Disagreement over the design of a new footbridge across the Leeds-Liverpool canal and near to an 18th century hump-backed bridge, is holding up the development of 400 homes.
Councillors have thrown out plans by Taywood Homes for the new bridge - described as resembling a Meccano set - at Swine Lane, Riddlesden.
Architects want to construct it only six metres away from the listed stone bridge, which was built in the 1770s.
It is the second time that councillors have considered an application, having refused permission on October 15 because they felt the footbridge was a cheap option and the multi-million pound housing development along the side of the canal warranted something better.
Taywood Homes have permission to build the 400 homes on condition that they widen Swine Lane bridge and Swine Lane to accommodate the extra traffic. But company bosses believe the scheme would be too expensive and have submitted the alternative plan for a footbridge and traffic lights on Swine Lane.
Planning officer Colin Waggett claimed the new bridge's steel structure would preserve the listed canal bridge without spoiling its setting or special architectural or historic features.
David Bateman, speaking for objectors, said the design was ridiculous. He said: "It is almost identical to a bridge spanning the M650 approaching the M62."
Keighley North Councillor Malcolm Slater said: "I would prefer a stone footbridge rather than the tawdry and weak design proposed.''
He was also concerned about disabled access and suggested there were eight potential hazards for disabled people in the metal design.
Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article