by Jo Winrow City Hall Reporter A long-running legal battle over the collapse of a £1.2 billion property deal to run Bradford Council’s buildings has been settled, costing taxpayers nearly £1 million.
The Council has paid out £825,000 to building services company Carillion in a lawsuit filed two years ago to recover millions in lost profits after the plug was pulled on the controversial Asset Management Project.
However, Labour councillors claim the true cost to the authority is up to £6m.
The deal would have seen 600 key buildings handed over to a private firm to run, including offices, swimming pools, libraries, theatres and sports centres. Carillion was named as the preferred bidder, but the scheme was suspended in 2005 on the day the contract was expected to be signed off by the executive.
There were anonymous allegations the bidding process had been skewed in Carillion’s favour. The whole scheme was later abandoned in 2007 without the allegations being substantiated.
A ten-day High Court hearing had been scheduled for February, but the Council has settled the case instead.
Council chief executive Tony Reeves said: “The Council has now settled litigation with the company Carillion plc, after careful consideration and bearing in mind potential escalating legal costs. Carillion’s claim against the Council was for £17 million. The cost to the Council is £825,000, including its legal costs.
“Both parties will pay their own legal costs.”
Council legal costs are expected to be £100,000.
Carillion sued for the amount it would have made in profit over the 20 years of the deal or compensation of £943,000 to cover the costs of preparing the contract bid.
Yesterday the company said it could not comment.
Public spending watchdog the Audit Commission was brought in to investigate the deal, which would have been one of the biggest in the Council’s history.
It released a damning report in 2006 which listed management failings by council officers.
Now Labour councillors have called for the district auditor to be brought in to further investigate. Council-lor David Green, the Labour group’s spokesman for regeneration, said he estimated the failed deal had cost taxpayers up to £6m.
“This is hopefully the end of one of the biggest financial disasters the Council has ever seen. When you take into account the procurement process, consultants and this payment, we estimate it will have wasted £6m of taxpayers’ money.”
The Council’s deputy leader, Tory councillor Dale Smith, said: “Despite the fact no contracts were ultimately awarded, a lot of work carried out in relation to the Asset Management Project has proven to be extremely useful for the Council in seeking to make best use of its resources.”
Liberal Democrat group leader Jeanette Sunderland said she was aggrieved the Council had had to pay out as the money could have been better spent elsewhere.
“When any Council enters contracts on this scale there are risks,” she said.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article