PLANNERS believe a 15-metre high 5G mast would create “unacceptable harm” to a village.
Bradford Council has refused a planning application to erect a mast, and install associated cabinets, on Lingfield Road in Wilsden.
CK Hutchison Networks had argued that there was a coverage gap in Wilsden, and the new mast was needed to provide the needed signal for users.
The company said the mast would “assimilate well” into the surrounding street scene.
The proposal had also divided opinion among residents. Four people had written to the Council in support of the plans, agreeing that better coverage was needed in the village.
But 32 people objected to the mast, saying it would be out of place in the chosen location, and a “complete eyesore” in the village.
Planning officers agreed with objectors, saying: “The proposed development will be highly visible given its prominent siting along the highway edge.
“The 15-metre mast and various associated cabinets and equipment would appear visually intrusive and would be substantially higher than the existing man-made features in the vicinity.
“The proposal would add an imposing modern element that would be visually jarring and detrimental to the character of the area.
“It is not agreed that the 'proposed location of a new mast will assimilate well into the immediate street scene'
"It is acknowledged that there is a 'coverage hole' in this location and the pole would extend 5G service across the target area though the site search criteria to identify potential alternative locations do not appear to have been robustly considered.
"It remains the case the siting and appearance of the mast would cause unacceptable harm to the visual amenity of the locality."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel