The following have been dealt with by Bradford Magistrates:

David Goggs, aged 22, of Hillcrest Drive, Queensbury; driving without insurance, £15 compensation, £140 costs, licence endorsed; driving without a licence, £80 fine. John Christopher Trotter, aged 19, of Milner Ing, Wyke; driving without insurance, £50 fine, £15 compensation, £60 costs, banned for six months; driving without a licence, £25 fine. Aqeel Ahmed, aged 25, of Hastings Street, Bowling; failure to produce insurance certificate, £30 fine, £15 compensation, £40 costs; failure to produce driving licence, £30 fine.

Darren Tetley, aged 40, of Darren Street, Laisterdyke; drunk and disorderly, £65 fine, £15 compensation, £60 costs. Michelle Claire Tomes, aged 25, of Cottingley Road, Sandy Lane; failure to provide specimen of breath, driving without a licence, driving without insurance, failure to surrender to custody, jailed for 12 weeks, banned for two years. Daniel Holdsworth, aged 22, of Kirklands Close, Baildon; using threatening or insulting words or behaviour, £100 costs, 250 hours unpaid work. Dilzar Mohsin Hassan, aged 23, of Hanover Square, city centre; using threatening or insulting words or behaviour, conditional discharge for one year.

Daniel Marshall, aged 20, of Danecourt Road, Holme Wood; breach of community rehabilitation order, 15 hours unpaid work. James Lowther, aged 24, of Walker Avenue, Great Horton; possession of stolen money, £100 fine, £115 compensation, £60 costs. Stephen Haslam, aged 38, of Fairhaven Green, Greengates; theft, jailed for four months. Irfan Mossom Pandor, aged 21, of St Margaret's Road, Lister Hills; failed to stop at a red traffic light, £60 fine, £40 costs, £15 compensation, licence endorsed. Karl Peter Lee Rastall, aged 30, of Hirst Lodge Court, Bolton; theft, £250 compensation, curfew for five months.

We wish to point out that all the information in this court file is provided by the magistrates' court, which collates the details largely from prosecutors and the police. In calculating the amount of any fine, the court takes into account the income of the offender as well as the seriousness of the offence.